NZEB Decision Guide

Find the right glazing for your nearly zero-energy building.

Answer five short questions about your building. We apply the EThCE framework — Energy, Thermal comfort, Cost-effectiveness, Environmental impact — to rank 10 glazing technologies for your specific situation.

40%

EU energy from buildings; glazing drives 20–60% of envelope heat loss.

10

glazing technologies assessed — from double to BIPV & vacuum.

4

EThCE criteria weighted: Energy, Comfort, Cost, Environment.

  1. 1 Profile Climate, type, WWR, orientation
  2. 2 Energy Performance by climate & strategy
  3. 3 Comfort Thermal comfort for occupants
  4. 4 Cost Upfront cost & payback range
  5. 5 Result Ranked shortlist with rationale
Step 1 of 5

Your building profile

01
Climate zone
Where is the building located?
Cold — Nordic / Baltic
HDD >3000 — long heating season, low solar angles. Finland, Sweden, Norway, Estonia.
Mixed — Central Europe
Balanced heating and cooling loads. Germany, Poland, Austria, Switzerland, UK.
Hot — Mediterranean
Dominant cooling load, high solar radiation. Spain, Italy, Greece, Portugal.
02
Building type
Primary use of the building.
Residential
Single-family, apartment, or multi-family housing.
Office / Commercial
Office, retail, or mixed-use commercial space.
03
Window-to-wall ratio (WWR)
Approximate glazed area as share of facade.
Low — under 20%
Modest windows, well-insulated opaque facade.
Medium — 20–40%
Standard proportion, typical of most new construction.
High — over 40%
Large glazed areas, curtain-wall or floor-to-ceiling glass.
04
Dominant facade orientation
Which direction does the main glazed facade face?
South-dominant
Main facade faces south — high solar gain potential.
North-dominant
Main facade faces north — low direct solar gain.
Mixed / Unknown
Multiple orientations or orientation not yet determined.

Source: Moghaddam et al. (2023), "Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Glazing Systems towards Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings", License: CC BY 4.0 Interactive tool ©Innopedia.

Step 2 of 5 — Energy Performance

How each glazing type performs for your profile

Energy scores reflect U-value and g-value performance under your climate zone and orientation. Higher is better. Source: Table 1, Moghaddam et al. (2023).

Glazing technology Energy score Key finding
Step 3 of 5 — Thermal Comfort

Occupant comfort implications

Comfort scores reflect risk of radiant asymmetry, cold-surface discomfort, and overheating — key factors for NZEB occupant wellbeing. High WWR amplifies these effects.

Glazing technology Energy Comfort Comfort note
Step 4 of 5 — Cost & Payback

Cost-effectiveness across your options

Payback periods are indicative ranges based on published literature. Advanced solutions carry higher upfront costs but may be justified over lifecycle, especially with energy generation (BIPV).

01
Budget sensitivity
How important is upfront cost vs. long-term performance?
Cost-first
Prefer lower upfront investment; longer payback is a concern.
Balanced
Weigh performance and cost equally across the lifecycle.
Performance-first
Prioritise best outcomes; willing to invest for long-term gain.
02
Building size
Larger buildings benefit from economies of scale on advanced systems.
Small — under 200 m²
Single-family home or small commercial unit.
Medium — 200–1000 m²
Apartment building, small office.
Large — over 1000 m²
Commercial, multi-story or public building.
Glazing technology Upfront cost Payback range Cost score
Step 5 of 5 — EThCE Recommendation

Your glazing shortlist

Scored across Energy (35%), Thermal comfort (30%), Cost-effectiveness (20%), and Environmental impact (15%) — weighted per the EThCE framework.

Rank Glazing technology Energy Comfort Cost Env Final score

Scores are indicative and based on published research ranges. Engage a building energy consultant to validate glazing selection for your specific project. Source: Moghaddam et al. (2023): "Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Glazing Systems towards Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings."